Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

NICHOLOPOULOS v. SUPERINTENDENT

United States District Court, W.D. New York


June 7, 2005.

RICKY J. NICHOLOPOULOS, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT, ELMIRA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge

ORDER

On April 1, 2003, petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on March 2, 2004. On February 14, 2005, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the petition be denied.

Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 25, 2005. Respondent filed a response thereto on May 9, 2005. The parties waived oral argument on petitioner's objections.

  Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions of the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

  Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to take all steps necessary to close this case.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050607

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.