Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Buy This Entire Record For
CHANDLER v. STOUTE
October 14, 2005.
SHAWN CHANDLER and JOHN BRYANT, Plaintiffs,
STEVE STOUTE, ARNELL GROUP, INC., and REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: SHIRA SCHEINDLIN, District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
For the reasons stated on the record at the conference on
August 1, 2005, an award of attorney's fees and costs to Arnell
Group, Inc. ("Arnell") and Reebok International, Ltd. ("Reebok")
is allowed under section 505 of the Copyright Act.*fn1
Arnell and Reebok have submitted documentation of their fees and
costs in connection with the summary judgment motion for a total
of $14,448.69. This figure represents just under 54 hours of
legal work by two partners, two associates, and two legal
assistants. The rates charged by counsel are somewhat lower than
those typically charged by attorneys at comparable law firms in the Southern District of New York. Having carefully
reviewed Arnell and Reebok's billing statements, I conclude that
these fees and expenses were reasonable, with one exception.
Plaintiffs have objected that $247.50 of this amount is
unreasonable because the documentation submitted does not make
clear if those fees are related to the motion for summary
judgment.*fn2 I agree, and therefore deduct that amount from
the fee requested. I have reviewed the remainder of plaintiffs'
objections and found that they are without merit. Accordingly,
Arnell and Reebok are entitled to an award in the amount of
$14,201.19 for preparing their motion for summary judgment.
In addition, Arnell and Reebok have requested litigation
expenses incurred since April 18, 2005 in the amount of $3,782.01
under Rules 54(d)(1) and 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Rule 68 allows the recovery of costs incurred after
the making of a settlement offer "[i]f the judgment finally
obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer."
Rule 54(d)(1) provides that "costs other than attorneys fees
shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the
Court otherwise directs." Rule 68 is not applicable here because neither Arnell nor
Reebok obtained any recovery from plaintiffs.*fn3 But a
prevailing defendant may "use a reasonable settlement offer as a
means of influencing the judge's discretion to award costs under
Rule 54(d)."*fn4 Arnell and Reebok offered to settle the
action for the reasonable amount of $25,000 on April 18, 2005.
Plaintiffs rejected the offer. Therefore, I find that Arnell and
Reebok are entitled to recover the $3,782.01 in costs incurred
since April 18, 2005 pursuant to Rule 54(d).
The application for an award of attorney's fees submitted by
Arnell and Reebok is hereby granted in the total amount of
$17,983.20. Payment is due twenty (20) days after the entry of
this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this
motion (Docket No. 63). SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...
Buy This Entire Record For