The opinion of the court was delivered by: Marian W. Payson United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Leonard Englert commenced this action on August 1, 2002 against defendants James and Kiyoshi Ishiguro and General Motors Corp. (Docket # 1). Englert's complaint arises from a traffic accident in which Englert's pick-up truck was struck by a vehicle driven by James Ishiguro. (Docket # 1). Englert filed suit against the Ishiguros and General Motors Corp., which he claimed had defectively designed the seatbelt in his pick-up truck. (Docket # 1). Englert has settled his claim against the Ishiguros, and the settlement proceeds have been paid to his attorneys, the Barnes Firm. Pursuant to the retainer agreement signed by Englert, the Barnes Firm retained one-third of the settlement as attorneys' fees and another unspecified amount as reimbursement for other costs related to the litigation.
Before disbursing the remainder to Englert, however, the Barnes Firm withheld an additional sum of $25,000, to be held as a retainer fund for the pending action against General Motors. The Barnes Firm has failed, however, to provide any documentation authorizing the withholding of the retainer, and Englert claims that no such authorization was given. At some time between November 2004 and March 2005, Englert demanded the return of the $25,000. In March 2005, the Barnes Firm issued a check to Englert for $14,325.33. According to counsel, that amount represented the amount remaining following a reduction of $2,362.97 (representing disbursements incurred between the time of the settlement and Englert's demand for the return of the money) -- bringing the balance in the settlement fund to $22,637.03 -- and a further reduction of $7,545.67 (one-third of $22,637.03).
My review of the record leads me to conclude that the retainer agreement authorized the Barnes Firm to retain as attorneys' fees one-third of the settlement proceeds, or $8,333 (one-third of $25,000), and to pay Englert the remainder, or $16,667. I cannot conclude that any further withholdings were authorized, and thus I find that $2,341.67 should be paid to Englert. That amount represents the difference between $16,667, which should have been paid to Englert, and $14,325.33, which was in fact paid to him.
Currently before this Court is Schaffer's motion to withdraw as Englert's counsel. (Docket # 30). During oral argument of counsel's motion to withdraw, Englert agreed that his relationship with his attorney has deteriorated and is no longer productive. I conclude, based upon the expressed views of both plaintiff and his attorney, that the application to withdraw as counsel should be granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that Gerald W. Schaffer, Jr., Esq. shall be relieved as counsel of record upon payment to Englert of $2,341.67, which amount shall be forwarded to Englert by no later than seven (7) days from the date of this Order, and it is further
ORDERED, that Schaffer shall provide to Englert by December 27, 2004, a complete copy of his file in this matter; and it is further
ORDERED that a status conference shall be held before this Court on February 8, 2006, at 11:40 a.m.,at which time Englert will be expected to advise the Court whether he has retained new counsel or whether he wishes to proceed pro se.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...