UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
December 15, 2005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
TEJINDER SINGH JAWANDHA AND RAJ KAMAL CLARE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge
THIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
The defendants have requested that the Second Amended Scheduling Order which was filed on November 15, 2005, be held in abeyance. The government does not object. The Second Amended Scheduling Order is hereby held in abeyance.
A status conference will be held before the undersigned on February 22, 2006, at 2:30 P.M.
In accordance with the Second Circuit Speedy Trial Guidelines, Part I(C)(3)(a) and (b), and upon the authority of United States v Piontek, 861 F.2d 152, 154 (7th Cir., 1988); United States v Montoya, 827 F.2d 143, 153 (7th Cir., 1987); United States v. Wilson, 835 F2d 1440, 1444 (D.C. Cir., 1987; United States v Tibboel, 753 F.2d 608, 610 (7th Cir., 1985); and United States v Jodoin, 672 F.2d 232, 238 (1st Cir., 1982), the period of time from the date of this order until February 22, 2006, is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).
Buffalo, New York
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.