Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tardd v. Brookhaven National Laboratory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


January 31, 2006

MALRY TARDD AND OTTO WHITE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court is the defendants' letter application dated January 25, 2006, seeking an additional two hours to depose the plaintiff Otto White ("White"). The plaintiffs' oppose this application. During his deposition, White disclosed that he prepared contemporaneous handwritten notes concerning the subject matter of this lawsuit. The defendants' counsel demanded production of the notes reserving the right to further depose the plaintiff after reviewing the documents. Plaintiffs' counsel agreed to this request. Plaintiffs' counsel subsequently failed to produce any additional handwritten notes and instead identified documents which had been previously produced. The documents identified by plaintiffs' counsel, however, do not correspond in time to the documents described by White. Given this apparent inconsistency, defendants' request to conduct an additional deposition with respect to these notes is granted.

SO ORDERED:

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20060131

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.