UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 1, 2006
JULU A. ROSS, PLAINTIFF,
J. MCCOY, SUPT.; G.A. RYAN, DEPT. SUPT. SEC.; ANTHONY, DEPT. ADIN.; A.J. ANNUCCI, DEP. COMM.; D. SELSKY, COMM.; FOOD ADMIN. HARRISON; D. SEITZ, CAPT.; J. LAMANNA, SGT.; SGT. RYERSON; M. EMERSON, SGT.; E. WOODARD, D. DEAN, R. CHAPIN, T. KOTT, G. HINMAN, C. HALL, J. EAMES, W. BROWN, AND JOHN DOE, EACH C.O.; JOHN DOE, SGT.; C.O. BEVIER; JOHN DOE C.O. #2; SERGEANT RYAN; AND C.O. EMERSON, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff, Julu A. Ross, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated January 20, 2006, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that all claims against defendants Sgt. Ryerson, E. Woodard, Sergeant Ryan, C.O. Emerson, and the John Doe defendants be dismissed without prejudice. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Peebles, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that
1. All claims against defendants Sgt. Ryerson, E. Woodard, Sergeant Ryan, C.O. Emerson, and the John Doe defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice; and
2. The case will be scheduled for trial against the remaining defendants.. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.