UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 27, 2006
ETHAN AMANO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
ALLIED DOMECQ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: VIKTOR V. Pohorelsky United States Magistrate Judge
DECISION AND ORDER
The plaintiffs seek the intervention of the court to address the defendants' alleged breaches of various terms of a settlement agreement, and to award attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in their efforts to enforce their rights under the agreement. The defendants, for their part, also seek an order requiring the plaintiffs to pay franchise and advertising fees they still owe.
Although the plaintiffs suggest that they asked the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the record does not reflect that any order to that effect has been entered by the court. The court thus does not have subject matter jurisdiction to resolve these breach of contract disputes. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 (1994). The plaintiffs' motion must therefore be denied.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.