Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hackert v. First Alert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 4, 2006

SHEILA HACKERT, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE GOODS, CHATTELS, AND CREDITS OF WILLIAM P. HACKERT, JR., AND CHRISTINE M. HACKERT, DECEASED; AND JOHN ANTHONY HACKERT, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FIRST ALERT, INC.; AND BRK BRANDS, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge

ORDER

At trial in this matter plaintiffs intend to play the videotaped testimony of Nicholas Bellavia, Gary Lederer and Beth Weber. Plaintiffs have provided transcripts of the testimony and the defendants have filed objections to portions of each deposition.

A. Objections to Testimony of Nicholas Bellavia (Docket No. 186.)

Defendants' objections to the testimony listed by letter at A, D, K and L are sustained. Defendants' objections as to the remainder of the testimony - listed at B, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, and M - are overruled.

B. Objections to Testimony of Gary Lederer (Docket No. 187.)

Defendants' objections to the testimony listed by letter at A, B, D through O, Q through W, Y, AA, BB, CC, FF, GG (pg. 36 lines 13 - 25), HH through MM, PP, QQ, RR, SS, UU, WW, XX, YY, ZZ, and AAA through HHH are sustained. Defendants' objections as to the remainder of the testimony - listed at C, P, X, Z, DD, EE, GG (pg. 36 lines 1-12), NN, OO, TT, and VV - are overruled. Defendants' objections to testimony in the Gary Lederer deposition on the ABC 20-20 show - lettered A through I - are overruled.

C. Objections to Testimony of Beth Weber (Docket No. 188.)

Defendants' objections to the testimony listed by letter at A, F, and G are sustained. Defendants' objections as to the remainder of the testimony - listed at B, C, D, E, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, and S - are overruled.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that Defendants' objections are SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, as set forth above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060404

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.