Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Houraney v. Town of Riverhead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


May 4, 2006

MARK HOURANEY AND NORTHEAST HOLDINGS, L.L.C., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TOWN OF RIVERHEAD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By letter application dated May 2, 2006, the plaintiffs seek to "uphold [their] objection to the [defendants'] Expert Disclosure" and demand that the defendants not be given any additional time for disclosure. Prior to submitting a discovery motion of this nature, counsel for the plaintiffs was required to confer with counsel for the defendants in good faith in an effort to resolve the dispute. See Local Rule 37.3(a). There is no indication that counsel made any effort to contact the defendants. Moreover, there is no application before the court for an extension of the discovery deadline, and thus, the plaintiffs' objection to such an extension is not ripe. The motion is, therefore, denied with leave to renew once the parties have attempted to resolve the discovery dispute.

ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20060504

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.