Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Freedom Calls Foundation v. Bukstel

July 14, 2006

FREEDOM CALLS FOUNDATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWARD BUKSTEL, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: VIKTOR V. Pohorelsky United States Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM

The plaintiff has submitted (but has not filed via ECF) a letter dated July 6, 2006 asking that the court not issue two subpoenas apparently requested by the defendant in a letter to the court dated June 27, 2006. This magistrate judge has not received the June 27 letter to which the July 6 letter refers, and therefore will take no action on the matter.

For future reference, should the defendant hereafter submit a letter requesting subpoenas, the defendant must of course serve the plaintiff with a copy of the letter (which apparently was done) as well as copies of the subpoenas requested. The plaintiff may thereafter, by letter, make a motion to quash, in whole or in part, the requested subpoenas, or seek to make some or all of the documents produced pursuant to the subpoenas subject to the confidentiality order which the court will enter shortly. See Order dated July 14, 2006.

20060714

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.