Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Monroy

July 31, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
JAVIER ALEXANDER ALVAREZ MONROY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Orenstein, Magistrate Judge

ORDER TO UNSEAL

On July 19, 2006, I denied as moot an application made under seal by defendant Cheryl Brenton ("Brenton") for an order directing the United States Marshals Serivce ("USMS") to provide her with transportation, lodging, and sustenance in connection with her anticipated appearance in court on July 26, 2006. See Docket Entry 46 (sealed order). Because the defendant asked, without explanation, that her application and my order upon it be sealed, I issued the order explaining my denial of the application under seal. Id. However, I noted at the time that the record then before me provided an insufficient basis on which to maintain the application and the order under seal and directed any party wishing to have the documents remain under seal after July 26, 2006, to make an application before that date explaining the need for continued secrecy. Id. That deadline has passed and I have not received any such application from any party. I therefore respectfully direct the Clerk to unseal both the original application to me, Docket Entry 45, and my subsequent order denying that application, Docket Entry 46.

SO ORDERED.

JAMES ORENSTEIN U.S. Magistrate Judge

20060731

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.