Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cook v. Hatch Associates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 11, 2006

NANCY COOK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HATCH ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard J. Arcara Chief Judge United States District Court

ORDER

On January 12, 2006, the defendant, Hatch Associates, filed a motion objecting to a jury determination as to lost wages arising under the plaintiff's Title VII claim. The defendant correctly points out that lost wages--in the form of back pay or front pay--is an equitable remedy to which a Title VII plaintiff is not entitled to a jury determination. See Broadnax v. City of New Haven, 415 F.3d 265, 271 (2d Cir. 2005); Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 267 F.3d 145, 157 (2d Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the defendant's motion to preclude a jury determination of the amount of plaintiff's lost wages is granted. However, the Court retains authority to submit the issue of lost wages to the jury for an advisory verdict if it deems such action appropriate. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(c) ("In all actions not triable of right by a jury the court upon motion or of its own initiative may try any issue with an advisory jury . . . ."); see also Hine v. Mineta, 238 F. Supp. 2d 497 (E.D.N.Y. 2003).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060911

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.