Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mantrose-Hauser Co., Inc. v. Freshxtend Technologies Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 11, 2006

MANTROSE-HAUSER CO., INC. PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
FRESHXTEND TECHNOLOGIES CORP. DEFENDANT(S)

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael A. Telesca United States District Judge

Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. has submitted to the Court evidence that he is presently a member in good standing of the Bar of Illinois and various federal courts and has requested to be admitted to practice before this Court with respect to the above-captioned matter. Upon due consideration, and pursuant to Local Rule 83.1(i), the request of Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1(l), the $75.00 fee required for pro hac vice admission may be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court.

Wherefore, upon receipt of the $75.00 admission fee, Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. will be admitted to practice pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter.

ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SO ORDERED.

20060911

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.