Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mantrose-Hauser Co., Inc. v. Freshxtend Technologies Corp.

September 11, 2006

MANTROSE-HAUSER CO., INC. PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
FRESHXTEND TECHNOLOGIES CORP. DEFENDANT(S)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael A. Telesca United States District Judge

Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. has submitted to the Court evidence that he is presently a member in good standing of the Bar of Illinois and various federal courts and has requested to be admitted to practice before this Court with respect to the above-captioned matter. Upon due consideration, and pursuant to Local Rule 83.1(i), the request of Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1(l), the $75.00 fee required for pro hac vice admission may be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court.

Wherefore, upon receipt of the $75.00 admission fee, Bradley F. Raudemaker, Esq. will be admitted to practice pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter.

ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SO ORDERED.

20060911

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.