UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
October 13, 2006
THOMAS LAMONT DYNO, PLAINTIFF,
THE VILLAGE OF JOHNSON CITY; AND HARRY G. LEWIS, MAYOR OF THE VILLAGE OF JOHNSON CITY, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Norman A. Mordue, Chief U.S. District Judge
This Court having dismissed plaintiff's amended complaint by Memorandum-Decision and Order dated September 276, 2004, for failure to state any legally viable cause of action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and plaintiff having moved for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and the Court having reviewed plaintiff's moving papers and having determined that plaintiff failed to identify the specific provision of Fed. R. Civ. P. under which he seeks relief; and the Court having further concluded that plaintiff's moving papers do not otherwise demonstrate mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, or fraud were factors affecting this Court's award of final judgment to defendants herein; and the Court having further concluded that the final judgment in question is neither void nor inequitable; and the Court having further concluded that plaintiff's moving papers fail to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances warranting relief from judgment, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.