Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eastern Wholesale Fence Co., Inc. v. Technoplast International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


October 16, 2006

EASTERN WHOLESALE FENCE CO., INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
TECHNOPLAST INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Defendant moves by letter dated October 11, 2006 pursuant to Federal Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 37.3 for an order precluding the plaintiff from submitting an expert report or expert testimony regarding damages. Plaintiff has opposed the application by letter dated October 13, 2006. For the reasons that follow, the application is denied.

By order dated June 21, 2006, the undersigned entered a pretrial scheduling order that set January 3, 2007 as the deadline for the completion of all discovery, including expert discovery. Given that the deadline is some twelve weeks away, there is no basis for imposing the sanction sought. Accordingly, the application is denied. Plaintiff is nonetheless reminded that it must provide its expert discovery at least 30 days in advance of the discovery deadline to permit the defendant an opportunity to respond.

SO ORDERED.

ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20061016

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.