UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
November 17, 2006
ESTEVAN CAMACHO, PETITIONER,
JOSEPH T. SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT, SHAWUNGUNK CORR. FACILITY, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gustave J. Dibianco, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Presently before this Court is a request from Petitioner Estevan Camacho ("Petitioner" or "Camacho") to stay his habeas Petition so that he may "exhaust new facts, and raise a claim that the evidence was insufficient for a conviction of both intentional and depraved indifference murder." Dkt. No. 14. Petitioner asks the Court to stay this action pending the outcome of Guzman v. Greene, 2006 WL 636972 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) which is presently pending before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Id.
Respondent opposes this Motion and asserts that the Guzman decision has no applicability to the instant Petition. Dkt. No. 15. Respondent points out that, although Camacho was indicted for both intentional murder and depraved indifference, he was only convicted on the intentional murder charge.*fn1 However, the Petitioner in Guzman was convicted under depraved indifference statute. Further, the Guzman case addresses substantive issues relating the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction under the depraved indifference statute, not the intentional murder statute. Accordingly, Respondent argues that the outcome of Guzman has no bearing on this Petition.
The Court agrees that the Guzman case has no bearing on this instant Petition. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion to Stay this action must be denied.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Petitioner's Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.