The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd U. S. District Court Judge
Presently before the Court is a civil rights complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis brought by plaintiff Said Gssime, who is presently incarcerated at Elmira Correctional Facility. Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant Pizzotto ignored his request for medical assistance. Dkt. No. 1 at 4. Plaintiff further alleges that defendant Cadian failed to protect him from an assault by another inmate. Id. at 5. As to defendant B. Nixon, identified as an inmate at Mid-State Correctional Facility, plaintiff appears to claim that he was kidnaped by B. Nixon. Id. at 5. For a complete statement of plaintiff's claims, reference is made to the complaint.
After reviewing the entire file herein, the Court finds that plaintiff's in forma pauperis application may be granted.
Plaintiff has alleged civil rights violations by an inmate, defendant Nixon. Section 1983 establishes a cause of action for "the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" of the United States. German v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 885 F.Supp. 537, 573 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (citing Wilder v. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n, 496 U.S. 498, 508 (1990) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1983)) (footnote omitted); see also Myers v. Wollowitz, No. 95-CV-0272, 1995 WL 236245, *2 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 1995) (McAvoy, C.J.) (§ 1983 "is the vehicle by which individuals may seek redress for alleged violations of their constitutional rights.") (citation omitted).
However, parties may not be held liable under this section unless it can be established that they have acted under the color of state law. See, e.g., Rounseville v. Zahl, 13 F.3d 625, 628 (2d Cir. 1994) (noting state action requirement under § 1983); Wise v. Battistoni, No. 92-CV-4288, 1992 WL 380914 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 10, 1992) (same) (citations omitted). State action is an essential element of any § 1983 claim. See Gentile v. Republic Tobacco Co., No. 95-CV-1500, 1995 WL 743719, *2 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 1995) (Pooler, J.) (citing Velaire v. City of Schenectady, 862 F.Supp. 774, 776 (N.D.N.Y. 1994)) (McAvoy, C.J.) (citation omitted)).
Upon review, the Court finds that the complaint, as drafted, does not set forth any allegations which would support a finding that Nixon acted under color of state law. Accordingly, the complaint fails to state a claim as against this individual, and he is hereby dismissed as a defendant.
1. B. Nixon is dismissed as a defendant in this action;
2. The plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is GRANTED.*fn1 The Clerk shall issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon the remaining defendants, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk shall forward copies of the summonses and complaint by mail to the Office of the New York State Attorney General, together with a copy of this Order;
3. The Clerk shall provide the Superintendent of the facility designated by the plaintiff as his current location with a copy of the plaintiff's authorization form, and notify the official that this action has been filed and that he is required to pay the entire statutory filing fee of $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915;
4. The Clerk shall provide a copy of the plaintiff's authorization form to the Financial Deputy of the Clerk's Office;
5. A formal response to plaintiff's complaint shall be filed by the defendants or their counsel as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ...