The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Norman A. Mordue, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs having duly moved this Court for entry of default judgment, pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant JPL Electric, Inc., And, the said motion have regularly come on to be heard.
NOW, upon reading and filing the Notice of Motion, dated the December 6, 2006 (Dkt. No. 10); the Amended Notice of Motion with a Certificate of Service for service on December 20, 2006 (Dkt. No.13); the Affidavit of Paul Kloc, sworn to the 21st day of November, 2006; the Affidavit of Michael J. Reed, sworn to the 4th day of December, 2006; the Affidavit of William Towsley, sworn to the 21st day of November, 2006; the Affidavit of Marilyn M. Oppedisano, sworn to the 4th day of December, 2006; the Affidavit of Peter Dulcich, sworn to the 22nd day of November, 2006; the Affidavit of Joseph W. McCarthy, sworn to the 30th day of November, 2006; the Affidavit of Linda L. DeMacy, sworn to the 14th day of November, 2006; the Affidavit of Jennifer A. Clark, sworn to the 14th day of November, 2006, together with the Summons and Complaint, and the Entry of Default on April 24, 2006 (Dkt. No. 6), all in support of said motion, and upon all the proceedings heretofore had herein, and defendant JPL Electric, Inc., having failed to plead or otherwise defend this action; and
NOW on motion of Blitman & King LLP, Jennifer A. Clark, of counsel, and after due deliberation having been had thereon, it is
ORDERED that the motion be and the same hereby is granted in all respects, and that judgment by default be entered in this action in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendant JPL Electric, Inc., for the relief demanded in the Complaint herein together with the costs and disbursements of this proceeding, and it is further
ORDERED that judgment be entered herein by the Clerk of the Court in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant JPL Electric, Inc., for the sum of $122,466.34, plus interest thereon at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a), and that Plaintiffs have execution therefore, and it is further
ORDERED that the Motion by the Court to Dismiss the action for Lack of Prosecution (Dkt.No. 9), is dismissed as moot.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...