The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gershon, United States District Judge
This is an action to obtain judgment for unpaid contributions to multi-employer benefit plans pursuant to sections 502 and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(3) and 1145 ("ERISA"), and to enforce the terms of the collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") pursuant to section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) ("LMRA"). Plaintiffs sue in their capacity as fiduciaries of the various Funds and seek the following: (1) a court order requiring A.J.S. Trucking to submit to an audit of its financial records for the period August 1, 2002 through the present; (2) payment of all unpaid contributions due and owing; (3) interest on the unpaid contributions; (4) penalty interest or liquidated damages; and (5) attorney's fees and costs. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's request is granted in part and denied in part.
The Funds are multi-employer benefit plans within the meaning of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002(3) and (37), and collect contributions from employers on behalf of all covered employees. The Funds are established and maintained pursuant to a CBA between Local 14-14B of the International Union of Operating Engineers (the "Union") and defendant effective January 28, 1991.*fn1 Defendant A.J.S. Trucking is an employer under ERISA and employs individuals represented by the Union. Defendant was, at all relevant times, and continues to be, bound to the terms of the CBA, which sets forth the wages, hours, other terms and conditions of employment, and obligates defendant to contribute monthly payments to the Funds on behalf of all employees covered by the CBA. Additionally, as a signatory to the CBA, defendant adopted the Declaration of Trust ("Trust Agreement"), which further governs the parties' rights and liabilities under the CBA.
Plaintiffs allege that, despite two previous requests, defendant failed to submit to an audit of its financial records, as required by the Trust Agreement. As a result, plaintiffs have been unable to ascertain the amount, if any, of unpaid contributions for the period August 1, 2002 through the present. Plaintiffs commenced the instant action on February 16, 2006, seeking (1) a court order requiring A.J.S. Trucking to submit to an audit of its financial records for the period August 1, 2002 through the present; (2) payment of all unpaid contributions due and owing; (3) interest on the unpaid contributions; (4) penalty interest or liquidated damages; and (5) attorney's fees and costs. After having been personally served with copies of the summons and complaint, defendant failed to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint and the time to do so has expired. To date, defendants have failed to make an appearance. As a result, a notation of default was entered by the Clerk of Court on June 26, 2006. On July 7, 2006, the court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Defendant's default amounts to an admission of liability. Therefore, all of the well-pleaded allegations in plaintiffs' complaint pertaining to liability are deemed true. Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992). Plaintiffs, however, must prove damages before the entry of a final default judgment. See Credit Lyonnais Sec., Inc. v. Alcantara, 183 F.3d 151, 155 (2d Cir. 1999); Au Bon Pain Corp. v. Artect, Inc., 653 F.2d 61, 65 (2d Cir. 1981). The district court must conduct an inquiry to ascertain the amount of damages with reasonable certainty. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 111 (2d Cir. 1997). Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that when granting a default judgment, if "it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence . . . the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper . . . ." The Second Circuit has held that, under Rule 55(b)(2), "it is not necessary for the District Court to hold a hearing, as long as it ensured that there was a basis for the damages specified in the default judgment." Transatlantic Marine, 109 F.3d at 111 (citation and internal quotations omitted).
ERISA allows employee benefit plan fiduciaries to bring civil actions to enforce the provisions of the plan and obtain equitable relief. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3)(B)(ii); see also id. § 1132(d)(1). Section 1145 makes clear that a plan member's contractual duty to make contributions to multiple employer plans "becomes a statutory requirement, and the duty may be enforced in accordance with § 1132(g)(2)." Gilles v. Burton Const. Co., 736 F.2d 1142, 1143 n.2 (7th Cir. 1984).*fn2 With respect to actions by fiduciaries, ERISA also provides for the recoupment of attorney's fees and costs stemming from the collection of delinquent contributions. Section 1132(g)(2) provides that in such actions the district court shall award the following:
(A) the unpaid contributions,
(B) interest on the unpaid contributions,
(C) an amount equal to the greater of--(i) interest on the unpaid contributions, or
(ii) liquidated damages provided for under the plan in an amount not in excess of 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under Federal or State law) of the amount ...