Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Guerra

February 16, 2007

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., AS BROADCAST LICENSEE OF THE MAY 28, 2005 ROBINSON/CHAVEZ PROGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CARLOS M. GUERRA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CEVICHERIA LOS GUERRA RESTAURANT A/K/A CEVICHERIA LOS GUERRA, AND CEVICHERIA LOS GUERRA RESTAURANT A/K/A CEVICHERIA LOS GUERRA, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Townes, United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

This is one of eight separate actions which have been brought pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 against defendant Carlos M. Guerra, individually and doing business as Cevicheria Los Guerra, by franchised cable television operators alleging that Guerra unlawfully intercepted and exhibited the closed circuit telecasts of sports events to patrons at Cevicheria Los Guerra (the "Establishment"). In this case, plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., alleges that it contracted with a boxing promoter to obtain the exclusive license to exhibit within the United States the telecast of a May 28, 2005, boxing program (the "Program"), but that defendant Guerra exhibited the Program at the Establishment without plaintiff's authorization.

As in the other seven actions, neither Guerra nor Cevicheria Los Guerra Restaurant filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint, and a default was entered against them. In October 2006, plaintiff moved for a default judgment in this case, seeking statutory damages of up to $10,000 pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II); enhanced damages of up to $100,000 pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §605(e)(3)(C)(ii); and costs and attorneys' fees. On October 23, 2006, Judge Gershon granted that motion, but referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Matsumoto for a Report and Recommendation as to the amount of relief to be awarded. After it was subsequently determined that this case was related to several others pending in this Court, this matter was transferred to this Court. This Court hereby vacates the referral order dated October 23, 2006, and, for the reasons set forth below, directs that the Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $6,361.50.

The Consequences of Defendants' Default

"Where, as here, 'the court determines that [a] defendant is in default, the factual allegations of the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, will be taken as true.'" Chen v. Jenna Lane, Inc., 30 F. Supp 2d 622, 623 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (quoting 10A C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2688, at 58-59 (3d ed. 1998)). Accordingly, by defaulting in this case, defendants have conceded, inter alia, that they (1) "willfully violated 47 U.S.C. § 605(a)," Complaint at ¶ 21, and (2) "willfully violated 47 U.S.C. § 553." Complaint at ¶ 35.*fn1

Although defendants have admitted liability under both § 605 and § 553, plaintiff "can recover under only one statute." Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. Brito, No. 05 CV 1042 (GBD) (RLE), 2006 WL 728408, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2006) (Report and Recommendation of Ellis, M.J.) (citing International Cablevision, Inc. v. Sykes, 75 F.3d 123, 129 (2d Cir. 1996)). In this case, plaintiff has elected to recover under § 605(a). Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law ("Plaintiff's Memo") at 7. Accordingly, this Court will proceed to determine the damages recoverable under that statute.

Damages Under § 605

Section 605(e) provides, inter alia, that any person aggrieved by a violation of § 605(a) can bring a civil action in district court, in which the court:

(i) may grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain violations of . . . [§ 605(a)];

(ii) may award damages as described in subparagraph (C); and

(iii) shall direct the recovery of full costs, including awarding reasonable attorneys' fees to an aggrieved party who prevails.

47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B). Subparagraph (C) permits the recovery of either actual damages under (C)(i)(I), or statutory damages under (C)(i)(II). Plaintiff requests that this Court award statutory damages. See Plaintiff's Memo at 7.

The statutory damages provision, § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), provides, in pertinent part:

[T]he party aggrieved may recover an award of statutory damages for each violation of [ยง 605(a)] . . . in a sum of not less than $1,000 or more than ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.