Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lauria v. Nextel of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


February 28, 2007

JOHN LAURIA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC., D/B/A NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court is the plaintiffs' letter application dated February 17, 2007 seeking to compel responses to its discovery demands and an extension of the discovery deadline. Defendants oppose the application insofar as it seeks to compel responses and consents to an extension of the discovery deadline. See Strasnick Letter, dated February 22, 2007. The application is denied with leave to renew. The parties have not attempted to confer in good faith as required by Rule 2(A)(1) of the undersigned's individual rules and Local Rule 37.3(A). Accordingly, the parties are directed to meet and confer to address the issues raised by the plaintiffs. Finally, the court declines to extend the June 18, 2007 discovery deadline at this time. The parties may renew this request as the deadline approaches. The renewed application shall include a summary of the discovery items to be completed.

SO ORDERED.

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20070228

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.