Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Protex International Corp. v. Vanguard Products Group

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 6, 2007

PROTEX INTERNATIONAL CORP., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
VANGUARD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

By letter dated February 21, 2007, plaintiff, Protex International Corp. ("Protex"), moves to compel the defendant, Vanguard Products Group, Inc. ("Vanguard"), to produce technical specifications and marketing materials for Vanguard's V-100 security system and any other security system having similar functionality. According to Protext, despite Vanguard's representation that these documents have already been produced, Protext is unable to locate them among the 70,000 documents produced by Vanguard. Thus, Protext requests that the court either compel Vanguard to re-produce these documents or direct Vanguard to identify these documents by Bates Number. Protext further seeks an award of attorney's fees incurred in connection with its efforts to secure these materials. Vanguard opposes this application stating that it has produced "all responsive documents in its possession known to exist," and that its production was made in accordance with Protext's request that its documents be scanned and produced electronically.

Rule 34 ordinarily requires that documents be produced either "as they are kept in the usual course of business" or "organize[d] and label[ed] [] to correspond with the categories in the request." Rule 34 also permits the parties to agree to a different methodology. Here, although the parties agreed that Vanguard's documents would be produced electronically, given the scope of this production it is not unreasonable to require that Vanguard identify the documents that correspond with this specific category. Thus, Vanguard shall identify the documents that relate to technical specifications and marketing materials for Vanguard's V-100 security system and any other security system having similar functionality. Protext's requests for attorney's fees is denied.

SO ORDERED

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20070306

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.