UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 13, 2007
COREY FORD, PLAINTIFF,
ROBERT KRUSEN, DONALD SELSKY, AND ANDREW HARVEY, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Scullin, Senior Judge
Plaintiff Corey Ford commenced this action by filing a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a decision rendered after a disciplinary hearing held at Shawangunk Correctional Facility. See Dkt. No. 1. In his habeas petition, Plaintiff alleged that his only sanction was eight-years of confinement in the Special Housing Unit ("SHU"); he did not assert a loss of good time credits. See id. In an Order filed January 22, 2007, this Court concluded that Plaintiff should have brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the disciplinary sentence did not impact Plaintiff's overall length of confinement.*fn1
See Dkt. No. 3 at 2. The Court directed Plaintiff to either consent to the recharacterization of this action as a civil rights action pursuant to § 1983 or demonstrate why he properly filed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.*fn2 See id. at 3. Plaintiff consented to the recharacterization of this action, see Dkt. No. 4 at 2, and filed a civil rights complaint and Prisoner Authorization Form, see Dkt. Nos. 5-6.
In his pro se complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Harvey, the hearing officer, violated his due process rights during a disciplinary hearing because he denied him adequate assistance and witnesses. See Dkt. No. 5 at 4. Plaintiff also claims that Defendant Krusen violated his due process rights by not providing him with adequate assistance or documents. See id. at 5. Finally, Plaintiff contends that Defendant Selsky kept him in SHU despite his knowledge of the due process violations.*fn3 See id. Although Plaintiff states, for the first time in his complaint, that his sentence included the loss of six years of good time credits, he also states that he "is abandoning any and all now/future claims to damages" in relation to this loss of good time credits.*fn4 See id. Plaintiff only seeks monetary damages for the days he has been confined in SHU. See id. at 6.
After reviewing Plaintiff's complaint, the Court accepts it for filing.
As to Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application, after reviewing the entire file, the Court finds that Plaintiff may properly proceed with this matter in forma pauperis.
Accordingly, based upon the foregoing, the Court hereby ORDERS that "Joseph T. Smith" is dismissed as a Defendant in this action; and the Court further
ORDERS that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is GRANTED.*fn5 The Clerk of the Court shall issue summonses and forward them, along with copies of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon the remaining Defendants, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall also forward a copy of the summons and complaint, together with a copy of this Order, by mail to the Office of the New York State Attorney General; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall provide the Superintendent of the facility that Plaintiff has designated as his current location, with a copy of Plaintiff's authorization form and notify that official that Plaintiff has filed this action and is required to pay the entire statutory filing fee of $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall provide a copy of Plaintiff's authorization form to the Financial Deputy of the Clerk's Office; and the Court further
ORDERS that Defendants or their counsel shall file a formal response to Plaintiff's complaint as provided for in Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after service of process on Defendants; and the Court further
ORDERS that the parties to this action shall file all pleadings, motions and other documents relating to this action with the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of New York, James Hanley Federal Building and Courthouse, 7th Floor, 100 South Clinton Street, Syracuse, New York 13261-7367. A party must accompany any paper that it sends to the Court or to the Clerk of the Court with a certificate showing that the party has mailed a true and correct copy of the same to all opposing parties or their counsel. The Clerk of the Court will return, without processing, any document that the Court or the Clerk of the Court receives which does not include a proper certificate of service. Plaintiff must comply with any requests of the Clerk's Office for any documents that are necessary to maintain this action. All parties must comply with this District's Local Rule 7.1 when filing motions, which must be returnable before the assigned magistrate judge with proper notice as the Rules require. Plaintiff is also required to notify the Clerk's Office and all parties or their counsel of any change in his address promptly; his failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. The Court will decide all motions on submitted papers without oral argument unless the Court orders otherwise; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular mail.
IT IS SO ORDERED.