UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 14, 2007
MARGARET VETERE, PLAINTIFF,
SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY, ET AL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Seybert, District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
In a Memorandum and Order dated October 13, 2006, the Court granted Plaintiff Margaret Vetere ("Plaintiff") permission to proceed in forma pauperis, but dismissed her Complaint inter alia, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint.
The Amended Complaint, which is seventy-four pages long, twenty pages more than the original Complaint, constitutes little improvement over its predecessor. It is rift with legal jargon and contains a litany of legal terms, legal definitions, multiple civil causes of actions, and irrelevant case citations. It is largely incomprehensible and incoherent.
For the reasons set forth in this Court's Memorandum and Order of October 13, 2006, the Court sua sponte DISMISSES the Amended Complaint in its entirety with prejudice.
JOANNA SEYBERT, U.S.D.J.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.