UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 22, 2007
HERMAN CRUZ, PLAINTIFF, -
AMBER LASHWAY, PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANT, DEFENDANT.
DECISION AND ORDER
The Clerk has sent to the Court a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order filed by Herman Cruz ("Plaintiff" or "Cruz"), who is currently incarcerated at the Upstate Correctional Facility. Plntf's Motion for TRO (Dkt. No. 4).
The Complaint in this action alleges that Defendant, a physician's assistant at Clinton Correctional Facility, denied Plaintiff proper medical care from January 2006 through July 2006, while he was housed at the Clinton facility. See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that these denials are, in part, in retaliation for grievances Plaintiff filed against Defendant when she was employed as a registered nurse at the Upstate Correctional Facility.
Plaintiff's Motion seeks a preliminary injunction directing Defendant to permit Plaintiff to have access to physicians and to receive "proper medication." Plntf's Motion for TRO (Dkt. No. 4). Defendants assert that the Motion is moot because Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at the Clinton Correctional Facility. Dkt. No. 30.
A preliminary injunction "is an extraordinary remedy and should not be routinely granted." Patton v. Dole, 806 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir. 1986) (citation omitted). In most cases, the party seeking the injunction must show "that [he] will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction and demonstrate either (1) a likelihood of success on the merits or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of the hardships tipping decidedly" in favor of the moving party. Jolly v. Coughlin, 76 F.3d 468, 473 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal quotation and other citation omitted).
However, the Court need not reach the merits of Plaintiff's Motions because it is clear that Plaintiff has been transferred out of the Clinton Correctional Facility. See Dkt. Nos. 17, 30. Since Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated under the supervision of the named Defendant in this action, the Court must deny his request for injunctive relief. SeeFED. R. CIV. P. 65(d); cf.Hallett v. New York State Dep't of Corr. Servs., 109 F. Supp. 2d 190, 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Dismissing, as moot, the plaintiff's requests for injunctive relief "[b]ecause he [was] no longer incarcerated and under the supervision of any of the named defendants . . ."); Candelaria v. Coughlin, 787 F. Supp 368, 377-378 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (Motion for preliminary injunction seeking medical treatment is rendered moot due to the plaintiff's transfer to a different facility).
WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.