Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steadman v. DuBray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 28, 2007

ANDRE STEADMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARK DUBRAY, OFFICER, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants. This case was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report-Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). Magistrate Judge Treece filed his Report-Recommendation on March 5, 2007. Magistrate Judge Treece recommended that the action be dismissed because it could not proceed without knowing the whereabouts of Plaintiff, which is a direct result of Plaintiff's failure to notify the court of his current address. No objections have been filed.

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein and DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint in its entirety.

The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20070328

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.