Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shapiro v. Laxman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 30, 2007

EDWARD SHAPIRO, P.C., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SHREENATH LAXMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By letter motion dated March 22, 2007, plaintiffs seek to compel responses to their interrogatories and requests to produce that were served on December 12, 2006. Defendants oppose the application by letter dated March 27, 2007. According to the defendants, the plaintiffs have not attempted to resolve these issues by first conferring with the defendants in good faith. Plaintiffs do not contend otherwise. Accordingly, the application is denied with leave to renew. The parties are directed to meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve these issues. The court interprets good faith to be in person contact either by telephone or in person. See Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Arlene Lindsay, Rule 2(A)(1).

SO ORDERED:

ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20070330

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.