Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shapiro v. Laxman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


May 21, 2007

EDWARD SHAPIRO, P.C., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SHREENATH LAXMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By letter dated May 15, 2007, the plaintiffs move to compel the defendants' answers to interrogatories and requests for the production of documents. Plaintiffs represent that the parties have conferred on the issues raised in their letter on February 12, 2007 and April 13, 2007, and, despite defendants' representation that they would supplement their discovery responses, they have not done so. Defendants oppose the application by letter dated May 17, 2007, asserting inter alia that the defendants have been diligently working to provide responses to plaintiffs. The defendants argue that the motion should be denied as premature.

Given the defendants' apparent willingness to supplement their response, plaintiffs' letter application is denied at this time. The defendants' supplemental response shall be served by May 31, 2007.

SO ORDERED

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20070521

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.