UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
June 26, 2007
IN RE SEPTEMBER 11TH LITIGATION
IN RE SEPTEMBER 11 PROPERTY DAMAGE AND BUSINESS LOSS LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S.D.J.
Having been sued by the legal successors to those who perished on September 11, 2001, defendants the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation, and WTC Retail LLC (collectively, "the Port Authority") asserted cross-claims against their co-defendants for indemnity and contribution. The Port Authority also asserted cross-claims for property damage arising out of the hijacking and crash of United Airlines Flight 175 against, among others, U.S. Airways, Colgan Air, and Continental Airlines. See Cross-Claims by the Port Authority Against Certain Defendants in Plaintiffs' Amended Flight 175 Master Liability Complaint, Sept. 10, 2004 (document no. 591).
U.S. Airways, Colgan Air, and Continental Airlines moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R. Civ. P., with respect to the Port Authority's cross-claims arising out of Flight 175. On June 26, 2007, the parties appeared before me for oral argument. As stated on the record, their motions are GRANTED because of a lack of duty, under the particular circumstances of this case, running from the moving defendants to the Port Authority.*fn1
The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of U.S. Airways, Colgan Air, and Conintental Airlines with respect to Cross-Claims by the Port Authority Against Certain Defendants in Plaintiffs' Amended Flight 175 Master Liability Complaint, Sept. 10, 2004 (document no. 591).
Dated: July 3, 2007
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN United States District Judge