Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Kelly

September 10, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HOWARD DENNIS KELLY, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant, Howard Dennis Kelly ("Kelly"), stands accused of a single-count indictment charging escape from a federal institutional facility. Counsel was appointed to represent Kelly. Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Kelly, pro se, a motion to dismiss (Dkt. #39) and a motion styled pro se motion, Rule 12(b), defective indictment. Since Kelly has counsel, he must not file pro se motions. If he has appointed counsel, that lawyer should represent him and file pleadings and the Court not entertain pro se motions. I have, nevertheless, reviewed the above-referenced motions and find them to be without merit. Therefore, both motions are denied.

CONCLUSION

Defendant's pro se motions to dismiss (Dkt. #39 and Dkt. #42) are in all respects denied.*fn1

IT IS SO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.