Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cain v. J.P.T. Automotive

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 11, 2007

ANTHONY CAIN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J.P.T. AUTOMOTIVE, INC., D/B/A FIVE TOWN TOYOTA, DEFENDANT.
J.P.T. AUTOMOTIVE, INC., D/B/A FIVE TOWN TOYOTA, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF
v.
INNOVATIVE AFTERMARKET SYSTEMS, INC., INNOVATIVE AFTERMARKET SYSTEMS, L.P., AND ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court are cross-motions to compel discovery made by the plaintiff and defendant-third party plaintiff J.P.T. Automotive, d/b/a/ Five Town Toyota ("J.P.T."). By letter dated August 23, 2007, plaintiff seeks an order compelling J.P.T. to provide responses to his interrogatories and documents requests. J.P.T. has responded by letter dated August 27, 2007 and cross-moves for an order compelling the plaintiff to provide a computation of his damages. The court first addresses the plaintiff's letter motion.

Given J.P.T.'s representation that it will be able to provide the discovery sought by September 30, 2007 it is ordered that J.P.T. shall produce these documents by September 30, 2007. Turning to J.P.T.'s motion that seeks to compel a computation of damages. Plaintiff contends that it cannot compute statutory damages under the Truth in Lending Act because such damages are "the lessor of $500,000 or 1 per cent of the net worth of the creditor." 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(2)(B). Because the creditor, J.P.T., has yet to provide documents concerning its net worth, plaintiff asserts that he cannot compute statutory damages at this time. Plaintiff also asserts that it is not possible to accurately calculate the actual damages incurred by class members without knowing what J.P.T. charged for the cards at issue or the number of cards sold.

The court agrees that J.P.T's request is premature given the status of discovery. Defendant may renew this request after relevant discovery has occurred.

SO ORDERED.

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20070911

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.