Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd. v. Combo Trading Inc.

October 17, 2007

KOON CHUN HING KEE SOY & SAUCE FACTORY, LTD., PLAINTIFF,
v.
COMBO TRADING INC., HENG LONG TAN A/K/A & MR. CHAN, ANGUS WONG AND JOHN DOES # 1-10, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sifton, Senior Judge.

OPINION

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd., brings this action against defendants Combo Trading Inc.; Heng Long Tan, a/k/a Mr. Chan; Angus Wong; and John Does # 1-10. In the Amended Complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants engaged in (1) trademark infringement, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1114; (2) counterfeiting, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116; (3) trade dress infringement, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (4) unfair competition, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (5) dilution, under NY Gen. Bus. Law, Section 360-L; and (6) common law unfair competition. On September 26, 2007, this Court granted plaintiff's motion for an ex-parte seizure order, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116, and motion for a temporary restraining order. On October 10, 2007 a post-seizure and preliminary injunction hearing was conducted before the undersigned. On October 11, 2007, the seizure order was confirmed and the temporary restraining order was extended until October 18, 2007. Now before this Court is plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against all defendants. Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth below, plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is granted.

BACKGROUND

The following findings of facts are derived from the underlying allegations in plaintiff's Complaint, affidavits submitted by plaintiff in connection with this motion, and from testimony provided at a hearing before the undersigned on October 10, 2007. There are no factual disputes between the parties and defendants do not oppose plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's Business and Trademarks

Plaintiff, a Hong Kong company, manufactures and distributes Cantonese food products such as sauces and seasonings under the name Koon Chun. These products are manufactured in Hong Kong and sold to exporters who buy the products on behalf of distributors around the world. The United States is one of plaintiff's largest markets.

Since September 1986, Plaintiff has been the owner of a trademark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, featuring a distinctive design that is used on all Koon Chun products and in conjunction with distinctive colors and shapes (including the shape of an antique Chinese wine glass) on product labels (the "trade dress"), which serves to distinguish the products for consumers. The label design has become associated by consumers and industry with plaintiff, and plaintiff enjoys substantial goodwill from the label design owing to the length of use and the design's distinctive nature.*fn1

Defendants' Activities

There exists an illicit industry manufacturing, importing, distributing and selling unauthorized versions of products of the type made by plaintiff bearing counterfeit versions or colorable imitations of plaintiff's trademark in the United States. Over the last several years, since discovering that such counterfeiting was going on, plaintiff has initiated several actions in United States courts to halt these activities and has, on order of appropriate courts, seized a substantial number of counterfeit items. These seizures included a seizure authorized by this Court on July 18, 2007, during which 17 cases of counterfeit Koon Chun products were recovered and a seizure authorized by this Court on August 6, 2007, during which 236 cases and three loose cans of counterfeit Koon Chun products were recovered. In the current action, plaintiff alleges that the defendants have engaged in selling counterfeit products bearing plaintiff's trademark and trade dress.

On August 22, 2007, for unexplained reasons, Koon Chun's investigator went to a warehouse located at 111 13th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215 where he noticed the sign "Combo Trading Inc." ("Combo") displayed at the premises. After informing an unidentified individual at the door that he wanted to purchase various sauce products, he was instructed to go to the office inside the warehouse. On his way to the office, he noticed about 50 cases of Koon Chun hoisin sauce and 50 cases of Koon Chun thick soy sauce being stored on warehouse racks. He observed that several of the hoisin sauce cases carried the same code number LGTD06375X on each of the cases and several cases of thick soy sauce carried the same code number VPGX00500J on each of the cases. According to plaintiff, genuine Koon Chun products carry a different code number on each case. Based on these observations, the investigator concluded that the contents of the cases were counterfeits.

When the investigator arrived at the office, he placed an order with another unidentified individual for one case of Koon Chun hoisin sauce, one case of Koon Chun thick soy sauce, one case of Koon Chun ground bean sauce, one case of Lee Kum Kee Panda brand oyster sauce, and one case of Koon Chun red vinegar. The investigator was provided with a handwritten invoice that did not list the brand names, only the product descriptions. The investigator paid $115.25 in cash for the purchase. The investigator asked for and received a calling card. The card stated "Combo Trading Inc." with the name of "Sai Kin Lam" in Chinese. The investigator asked the man who sold the goods to him whether he was Mr. Lam. The man replied that his surname was Chan and that Mr. Lam was his colleague.

When the investigator later inspected the products he had purchased, he found that the one case of Koon Chun hoisin sauce, one case of Koon Chun thick soy sauce, and one case of Koon Chun ground bean sauce, contained counterfeit goods.*fn2

According to Koon Chun's investigator, the boxes of these products were hand-glued, in contrast to authentic Koon Chun boxes which are machine glued. In addition, the number "1" on the date/time stamp on the counterfeit products had a short horizontal line at the bottom of the number, while authentic Koon Chun products have no such line.

Following the purchase of the counterfeit products, plaintiff conducted a search for Combo on the website of the New York State Department of State, Division of Corporations, the results of which showed defendant Angus Wong ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.