The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Hugh B. Scott
Before the Court is all parties' proposed settlement of this class action. As a settlement class, the parties are seeking formal certification of the class and appointment of plaintiffs' counsel as class counsel. (See letter to Chambers, dated October 12, 2007*fn1 ; Docket No. 48 (stipulation so ordered).)
This civil rights class action challenges the practices of Erie County Department of Social Services in the handling of Medicaid, food stamps, and public assistance applications in the wake of the recent county budget crisis. Plaintiffs filed this action on February 10, 2006 (Docket No. 1). On February 21, 2006, Judge Elfvin granted plaintiffs' motion for a Temporary Restraining Order against the County defendant, Commissioner Michael Weiner (Docket No. 25). Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint (Docket No. 30) and moved for certification of the class (Docket No. 21).
The parties reached a stipulation to settle this action, including defining the affected class and stipulating to its certification. The parties also consented to proceed before the undersigned as Magistrate Judge on September 4, 2007 (Docket No. 44). Defendants deny any and all claims of wrongdoing asserted in connection with the Complaint and no finding of liability has been entered herein.
Consideration of the fairness of the settlement terms are now pending before the Court and will be addressed separately.
Settlement of a class action is approved by the Court only after a fairness hearing and a finding that the settlement is "fair, reasonable, and adequate," Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(C), and that all the elements for certifying a class exist, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), (b)(2); see also id. R. 23(e)(1)(A) (Court must approve settlement of a certified class); Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 621 (1997). The Court reviews the settlement class with heightened scrutiny for compliance with the class prerequisites and maintenance as well as the intrinsic fairness of the proposed settlement, Amchem Prods., supra, 521 U.S. at 620; 5 Moore's Federal Practice 3d § 23.161[b], at 23-491 (2007). This Court will deal first with the class certification and class counsel issues, which the parties have stipulated to.
Here, the parties stipulate that the prerequisites for a maintainable class is present here. From the Court's review of the moving papers for class certification and find that the class as defined in the parties' stipulation meets those prerequisites and is maintainable.
Rule 23(g)(1) requires the Court to appoint class counsel and to consider the work proposed class counsel has done in identifying or investigating potential claims in this action; counsel's experience in handling class actions, other complex litigation, and claims of the type asserted here; counsel's knowledge of the applicable law; the resources counsel will commit to representing the class; and other matter pertinent to counsel's ability to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(1)(A), (C).
The parties agree to plaintiffs' counsel serving as class counsel. From plaintiffs' class certification motion and the handling of this action to date, the Court is satisfied that plaintiff's counsel meets the ...