UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
November 8, 2007
ARTHUR COTA, PLAINTIFF,
SYRACUSE, NY; ASHCROFT; MANHATEN, NY, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas J. Mcavoy, Senior U.S. District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
The Clerk has sent to the Court for review an amended Complaint filed by Arthur Cota ("Plaintiff" or "Cota"), pursuant to this Court's September 20, 2007 Order.
The September Order found that: ... Cota's statement of claims is an incomprehensible grouping of word and phrases. It is not clear why the particular parties are named as Defendants, nor does the statement of Plaintiff's claims allege any wrongful conduct by any of the named Defendants. No facts are alleged in the Complaint which, in any way, would support any basis for awarding Cota either equitable or monetary relief. Dkt. No. 4.
A review of the amended Complaint reveals that it is also an incomprehensible grouping of word and phrases that fails to set forth any actionable claim against the Defendants named therein. Dkt. No. 10.
Accordingly, this action must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED, that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order on the Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.