Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Alessio v. Carey

Other Lower Courts

December 6, 2007

George P. Alessio, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
Paul G. Carey, Helen M. Kiggins, Edward J. Szczesniak, Onondaga County Board of Elections, Respondents.

Editorial Note:

This case is not published in a printed volume and its disposition appears in a table in the reporter.

COUNSEL

Joseph Cote, Esq.,  Cote, Limpert Van Dyke, LLP Attorneys for Petitioner George P. Alessio.

Jeffrey T. Buley, Esq. Attorney for Respondent Paul G. Carey

Joanna Gozzi, Esq. Anthony P. Rivizzigno, Onondaga County Attorney Attorneys for Onondaga County Respondents Onondaga County Department of Law

OPINION

Deborah H. Karalunas, J.

By order to show cause dated November 21, 2007 and signed by Justice James Murphy, petitioner George P. Alessio sought court examination of seven disputed absentee ballots cast in the November 6, 2007 general election for the office of town justice in the Town of Salina. Petitioner in the order to show cause also sought a "preliminary injunction affording the relief requested in Plaintiff's Motion, " which this court construes as the relief requested in Alessio's verified petition filed on November 21, 2007. The petition seeks the following relief: (1) a judicial determination that seven disputed ballots are valid; (2) an order directing the Board of Elections to recanvass returns in the election of Salina town justice to include seven disputed ballots; and (3) an order directing correction of any statement by the Board of Elections to include seven disputed ballots as valid ballots. Respondent Paul G. Carey field a verified answer to the petition but no cross-petition.

An evidentiary hearing took place on November 30, 2007. At that time, counsel for petitioner amended the petition to clarify that Alessio sought a judicial determination regarding the validity of the seven disputed ballots but not a ruling that all seven were valid.

Justice Murphy on December 3, 2007 signed an amended order to show cause in this matter. Among other things, the amended show cause order nunc pro tunc allowed service of the original order to show cause, petition and supporting papers upon Carey by personal service on or before November 28, 2007. In an amended answer verified on December 3, 2007, respondent Carey asserted two cross-claims.

II. Facts

Petitioner George P. Alessio was the Democratic and Working Families candidate for the office of Salina town justice in the November 6, 2007 general election. Respondent Paul G. Carey was the Republican, Conservative and Independence candidate for the same office.

Acting in their capacity as Board of Elections commissioners, Respondents Helen M. Kiggins and Edward J. Szczesniak, oversaw the canvass of absentee ballots in the town justice race. During that process, elections inspectors ruled that seven ballots were invalid. These ballots were not included in the final vote totals. Petitioner's representatives objected to the ruling. Five of the seven ballots cast votes for Alessio and the other two cast votes for Carey.

Petitioner contends that the Board of Elections intended to declare Carey the winner of the Salina town justice race by a two-vote margin out of nearly 9, 000 votes cast. The original and amended orders to show cause enjoined respondents from certifying the result of the election or taking ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.