Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Doe v. Tremblay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


December 18, 2007

JANE DOE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARC J. TREMBLAY, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

Upon the papers submitted by Plaintiff seeking Court approval of the discontinuance of the instant action [dkt. # 24], including the affirmation of Dr. Robert Hertz opining that Ms. Doe is capable of understanding the legal ramifications of voluntary discontinuance [dkt. # 37], and upon Defendants' consent to discontinuance [dkt. # 26], the motion is GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED.

That portion of Plaintiff's motion seeking to seal the entire file in this matter [dkt. # 24] is DENIED. Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978); In re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110, 114 (2d Cir. 1987)("New York Times I"), after remand 834 F.2d 1152 (2d Cir. 1987) ("New York Times II"), after remand 837 F.2d 599 (2d Cir. 1988)("New York Times III"), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 977 (1988).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20071218

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.