Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vonhagn v. Corning Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


January 8, 2008

MARGARET VONHAGN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CORNING INCORPORATED, THE CORNING INCORPORATED BENEFITS COMMITTEE, SYNCHRONY INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICES, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., INC., A/K/A METLIFE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

On October 31, 2007, which was the deadline for dispositive motions in this matter pursuant to the governing Scheduling Order, defendants Corning Incorporated and the Corning Incorporated Benefits Committee (collectively "Corning") filed a timely motion for summary judgment. (Dkt #13).

On December 28, 2007, plaintiff initiated the filing of a cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #22). Corning has objected to the timeliness of plaintiff's cross-motion, since it was not filed until after the Scheduling Order's deadline for "all dispositive motions" had expired. However, plaintiff's cross-motion is primarily a response to Corning's dispositive motion, the deadline for which is not specifically delineated or addressed by the governing Scheduling Order. As such, I deem plaintiff's motion to be timely. Responses and replies on that motion will be governed by the Court's Motion Scheduling Order for plaintiff's cross-motion, dated January 2, 2008 (Dkt. #29).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Rochester, New York

20080108

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.