Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Rudolph

January 24, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
WHIRLEE RUDOLPH, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thomas J. McAVOY Senior United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Defendant moves pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 or, in the alternative, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to have this Court declare that his federal sentence runs concurrently with his later imposed state sentence. Because the instant motion was made more than seven days after sentencing, no relief may be afforded under Rule 35(a). No relief can be afforded under Rule 35(b) because the government has not made such an application. No relief can be afforded under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because such a petition would be untimely (more than one year after judgment was entered and more than one year after Defendant was paroled by the State of New York and released into the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service) and Defendant has failed to demonstrate any grounds warranting relief under § 2255.

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080124

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.