Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Paladino v. DHL Express

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


February 5, 2008

DINO PALADINO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DHL EXPRESS(USA), INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

By letter dated January 22, 2008, defendant DHL Express (USA), Inc. moves to compel the plaintiff to provide outstanding discovery and authorizations for the release of his health information pursuant to HIPPA. Plaintiff has responded by letter dated January 31, 2008. Plaintiff represents that he has committed to provide all of the outstanding discovery and authorizations by February 1, 2008 and therefore requests that the court hold defendant's application in abeyance.

Given the plaintiff's representation, the defendant's application is denied with leave to renew if necessary following review of the plaintiff's production. The parties are reminded of the requirement that they first meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve their dispute prior to seeking judicial intervention. See Local Civil Rule 37.3(a); see also Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lindsay, Rule 2(A)(1).

SO ORDERED

ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20080205

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.