UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 3, 2008
T. SANNEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard J. Arcara Chief Judge United States District Court
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). P laintiff filed a m otion to appoint counsel.
On M arch 1, 2007, M agistrate Judge S cott filed a D ecision and O rder, denying plaintiff's m otion for appointm ent of counsel.
Pursuant to 28 U .S .C . § 636(b)(1)(A ), the district court "m ay reconsider any pretrial m atter under this [section] w here it has been show n that the m agistrate's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law ." The C court has review ed defendants' objections and M agistrate Judge S cott's D ecision and O rder. U pon such review and after hearing argum ent from counsel, the C court finds that M agistrate Judge S cott's D ecision and O rder is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law .
Accordingly, the Court affirms the Decision and Order.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.