Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Coolie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 11, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
REGGIE COOLIE

USM No. 12165-052

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Date of Previous Judgment: August 29, 2002

Peter Fitzgerald, Esq. Defendant's Attorney

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

Upon motion of X the defendant G the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

X DENIED. The defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment remains the same.

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE(Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: Amended Offense Level: Criminal History Category: Criminal History Category:

Previous Guideline Range: to months Amended Guideline Range: to months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

G The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. 9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

G Other (explain):__________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

The defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction as the defendant's sentence was based on a cross reference to the sentencing guidelines for the offense of murder.

All provisions of the judgment dated August 29, 2002 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080311

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.