Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT for the Western District of New York


March 25, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
OKEEM WILLIAMS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Charles J. Siragusa, U.S. District Judge

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

USM No: Date of Previous Judgment: August 14, 2001 ) Joel Krane, Esq.

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) ) Defendant's Attorney

Amended Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of TM the defendant TM the Director of the Bureau of Prisons x the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

TM DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 135 months is reduced to 120 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE(Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 32 Amended Offense Level: 30 Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: II Previous Guideline Range: 135 to 168 months Amended Guideline Range: 108 to 135 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

TM The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

X Other (explain): Based on a sentencing guideline range of 135 to 168 months, the Court previously sentenced the defendant to 135 months. With an amended sentencing guideline range of 108 to 135 months, the Court sentences the defendant to 120 months, which is the statutory minimum.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 8/14/2001 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: March 24, 2008

20080325

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.