Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Gomez v. Volpe
March 27, 2008
KIERAN GOMEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTHONY M. VOLPE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on January 8, 2008, by the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 23).
Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge DiBianco's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 23) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute as a discovery sanction (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...