Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HR US LLC v. Mizco International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


May 12, 2008

HR US LLC, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIZCO INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: James Orenstein, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Defendants Mizco International, Inc. and Albert Mizrahi (collectively, "Mizco") seek to preclude plaintiff HR US LLC ("HR") from questioning any expert witness at trial regarding certain patents as a remedy for HR's failure to provide notice earlier of its intention to make such use of the patents in cross-examining Mizco's experts. Mizco has not identified the source of HR's legal obligation to provide such notice. Accordingly, I deny Mizco's application for relief. Further, as no party seeks to re-open discovery, I do not consider doing so as a remedy for the conduct of which Mizco complains. Discovery therefore remains closed. In addition, the parties have submitted a proposed joint pretrial order, which I find substantially complies with the requirements of the Honorable David G. Trager, United States District Judge. Accordingly, the joint pretrial order is accepted for filing and the action is deemed ready for trial without prejudice to any potentially dispositive motion practice. The action will be tried in accordance with the discretion and trial calendar of District Judge David G. Trager.

SO ORDERED.

JAMES ORENSTEIN U.S. Magistrate Judge

20080512

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.