Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gamble v. East Bronx N.A.A.C.P. Day Care Center

May 14, 2008

BRIDGET GAMBLE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EAST BRONX N.A.A.C.P. DAY CARE CENTER, INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kimba M. Wood, U.S.D.J.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Bridget Gamble ("Plaintiff") moves for attorneys' fees, costs, pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest. The Court awards (1) attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,750.00; (2) costs in the amount of $349.65; (3) pre-judgment interest in the amount of $7,906.24; and (4) post-judgment interest in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

I. Procedural History

Plaintiff brought this action, alleging that her employer, Defendant East Bronx N.A.A.C.P. Day Care Center, Inc. ("Defendant"), violated (1) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., by failing to contribute to Plaintiff's pension plan over an approximately four-year period, and (2) the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law, N.Y. Lab. Law Art. 6, §§ 190-199, Art. 19, §§ 650-665 (McKinney 2007), by failing to pay Plaintiff for hours worked in excess of her normal, forty-hour work week.

By Report and Recommendation dated December 16, 2005, familiarity with which is assumed, Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman recommended that a default judgment in favor of Plaintiff be entered in the amount of $23,126.74. (Docket Entry 8.) On January 25, 2006, the Court adopted this recommendation. (Docket Entry 13.) On February 6, 2006, the Clerk's Office entered judgment for Plaintiff in the amount of $23,126.74. (Docket Entry 15.)

Plaintiff now moves for attorneys' fees, costs, pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest. (Docket Entries 10, 17, 18.) By Report and Recommendation dated February 29, 2008 ("Report"), familiarity with which is assumed, Magistrate Judge Pitman recommended the award of (1) attorneys' fees in the amount of $11,500.00; (2) costs in the amount of $349.65; (3) prejudgment interest in the amount of $8,579.80; and (4) post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (Report 24, Docket Entry 19.)

The Report informed the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72(b), in conjunction with Rule 6, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, they had ten days from service of the Report to file any objections. The Report also informed the parties of the opportunity to request an extension of time to file objections. Finally, the Report explicitly cautioned that failure to file timely objections would preclude appellate review. (Report 25.)

No objections have been filed, and the time to object has expired. See IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann, 9 F.3d 1049, 1054 (2d Cir. 1993). The Second Circuit "ha[s] adopted the rule that failure to object timely to a magistrate's report operates as a waiver of any further judicial review of the magistrate's decision," Small v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989) (citations omitted); "[t]he Supreme Court upheld this practice, at least when the parties receive clear notice of the consequences of their failure to object." Id. (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985)).

II. Discussion

The Court has reviewed the Report and finds it to be well-reasoned and free of any "clear error on the face of the record."*fn1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note; see also Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). The Court therefore adopts the Report's analysis, but modifies the calculation of attorneys' fees and pre-judgment interest. The Court also clarifies the award of post-judgment interest.

A. Attorneys' Fees

The Court adopts the Report's recommended reduction of hours from 17.75 hours of partner time to 15.0 hours of partner time, and from 37.75 hours of associate time to 25.0 hours of associate time. (Report 14-16.)

The partners who worked on this case seek compensation at a $350.00 hourly rate. (Report 4-5.) The Report recommended applying an hourly rate of $350.00 to the full 15.0 hours of partner time. The Court adopts this recommendation.

The senior associate who worked on this case seeks compensation at a $250.00 hourly rate. (Report 5.) The three junior associates who worked on this case seek compensation at a $200.00 hourly rate. (Id. at 6.) The Report recommended applying an hourly rate of $250.00 to the reasonable amount of associate time to have spent on this case, 25.0 hours. The Court agrees with the Report's recommendation that the reasonable amount of associate time to have spent on this case is 25.0 hours. However, the Court divides the 25.0 hours of associate time into 10.0 hours of senior associate time and 15.0 hours of junior associate time. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.