UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2008
STEVE LEONE, WAFIK AL TAWEL, DOING BUSINESS AS LIL BROOKLYN MINI MART, PLAINTIFFS,
LINDA M. STANGLE, COMMISSIONER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF ROCHESTER, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge
DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs, Steve Leone and Wafik Al Tawel, commenced this action on March 17, 2005, against Linda M. Stangle, the then-Commissioner of Community Development for the City of Rochester. Plaintiffs allege claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of certain incidents that occurred in 2003 and 2004.
On April 14, 2008, the Court issued an order directing plaintiffs to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41.2 of the Local Rules for this district, since no activity had occurred in the case since the complaint was filed. The order, which was mailed to plaintiff's attorney at the address given on the complaint, was returned as undeliverable on May 5, 2008.
Dismissal is clearly warranted here. Local Rule 41.2 provides that in a civil case in which no action has been taken by the parties in six months, "the Court may order the parties to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute." If the parties fail to respond to the order, the court may dismiss the action for failure to prosecute. As stated, the Court issued such an order, but it was never received by their attorney, apparently because he is no longer at his address on record with the Court, and neither he nor plaintiffs have advised the Court of any current mailing address.
In light of these facts, and the other relevant factors set forth by the Second Circuit, see United States ex rel. Drake v. Norden Systems, Inc., 375 F.3d 248, 254 (2d Cir. 2004), I conclude that this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
This action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Rule 41.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the Western District of New York.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Rochester, New York
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.