SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
November 25, 2008
IN THE MATTER OF SEMEN MILMAN, APPELLANT,
YEUGENIY SHEHUPAK, RESPONDENT.
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Semen Milman appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated May 23, 2007, which, after a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., PETER B. SKELOS, RUTH C. BALKIN, ARIEL E. BELEN, JJ.
(Docket No. O-08666-06)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal (see e.g. Matter of Bodouva v Bodouva, 53 AD3d 483; Matter of Burke v Burke, 45 AD3d 591, 592; Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639; Matter of Lane v Lane, 8 AD3d 486). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is therefore granted (see Matter of Ingle v Ingle, 19 AD3d 420; Matter of Mejias v Aleman, 10 AD3d 421; see also Anders v California, 386 US 738).
MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, BALKIN and BELEN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.