Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Karenkim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


December 4, 2008

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KARENKIM, INC. D/B/A PAUL'S BIG M, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Norman A. Mordue, Chief U.S. District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), filed this action (Dkt. No. 1) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide appropriate relief to Andrea Bradford, Judith Goodrich, and Deborah Haskins, and a class of similarly situated female employees. Andrea Bradford, Judith Goodrich, and Deborah Haskins move (Dkt. No. 7) to intervene in this action as a matter of right. Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1). By letter (Dkt. No. 9), defendant states it does not oppose the motion. Plaintiff EEOC raises no objection.

It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to intervene (Dkt. No. 7) is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs-intervenors shall file and serve the proposed intervention complaint attached to their motion papers within 10 days of the date of this order, and defendant shall answer or move within 20 days thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20081204

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.