SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
December 16, 2008
ANA IRIS CARPIO MORALES, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS,
78 4TH AVENUE CORP., ET AL., APPELLANTS.
In an action, inter alia, to set aside a deed conveying real property, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated November 14, 2007, as denied their cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the complaint based on documentary evidence.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, RUTH C. BALKIN and WILLIAM E. McCARTHY, JJ.
(Index No. 20410/07)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) "may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v MartÍnez, 84 NY2d 83, 88; Kalmon Dolgin Affiliates of Long Is. v Robert Plan Corp., 248 AD2d 594). As the Supreme Court properly concluded, the documentary evidence submitted by the defendants in support of their cross motion to dismiss does not establish their defense as a matter of law or definitely dispose of the allegations in the complaint. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' cross motion to dismiss the complaint.
MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, BALKIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.