SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
January 13, 2009
THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT,
WILFREDO VELAZQUEZ, APPELLANT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Knopf, J.), rendered July 17, 2006, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing an indeterminate sentence of 15 years to life imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently with each other.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., STEVEN W. FISHER, HOWARD MILLER & EDWARD D. CARNI, JJ.
(Ind. No. 1602/05)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the adjudication of the defendant as a persistent felony offender, adjudicating him a second felony offender, and reducing his sentences from an indeterminate term of 15 years to life imprisonment to an indeterminate term of 31/2 to 7 years of imprisonment on the count of burglary in the third degree and from an indeterminate term of 15 years to life imprisonment to an indeterminate term of 31/2 to 7 years of imprisonment on the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, to run concurrently with each other.
The totality of the evidence adduced at the persistent felony offender hearing, although warranting the defendant's adjudication as a second felony offender, did not warrant his adjudication as a persistent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.10; People v Greene,AD3d, 2008 NY Slip Op 10636, *2 [2d Dept 2008]). Accordingly, we reduce the sentences imposed for burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree—both class D felonies—to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 31/2 to 7 years, which is the maximum permissible sentence for a second felony offender convicted of those crimes (see Penal Law § 70.06[d]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit, do not require reversal, or need not be reached in light of our determination.
MASTRO, J.P., FISHER, MILLER and CARNI, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.